Paper check About

Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · paper · Clinical trials

A randomized trial of 660 adults comparing aflibercept, bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular edema. Vision improved most with aflibercept at one year, but the authors report the difference came from eyes with worse starting vision and was not clinically meaningful in others.

0 findings

None that passed a second check.

2 minor (typos and the like; most checked by the judge only)
Typo "visual acuity" is printed run together as "visualacuity": "both initial-visualacuity subgroups" (p8) and "initial visualacuity loss was mild" (p9).
  • p. 8 Discussion, first line of page
    both initial-visualacuity subgroups
  • p. 9 Conclusion paragraph
    initial visualacuity loss was mild

Judge's note: Crops C003-a (p8, line 2) and C003-b (p9, line 3) both show "visualacuity" in the middle of a line, so this is not a text-layer artefact from a lost hyphen. Elsewhere the paper writes "visual-acuity". This is a cosmetic typo.

Second check: none (judge only)

Report a problem with this finding
Typo There is a stray space after the en dash in "resolution of central-subfield– involved diabetic macular edema" (p8).
  • p. 8 Discussion, second paragraph
    central-subfield– involved diabetic macular edema

Judge's note: Crop C004-a (p8, Discussion paragraph 2) shows a visible space between the en dash and "involved" in the middle of a line. This is cosmetic; it should read "central-subfield–involved".

Second check: none (judge only)

Report a problem with this finding
Something wrong with this page, or a finding we missed?